| 1 |
PSEP: 101 |
| 2 |
Title: Adopt PyQt's API 2 for PySide |
| 3 |
Version: $Revision$ |
| 4 |
Last-Modified: $Date$ |
| 5 |
Author: Mark Summerfield <mark@qtrac.eu> |
| 6 |
Status: Final |
| 7 |
Type: Standards Track |
| 8 |
Content-Type: text/x-rst |
| 9 |
Created: 14-Apr-2010 |
| 10 |
Post-History: 14-Apr-2010, 15-Apr-2010, 16-Apr-2010, 20-Apr-2010, 22-Apr-2010, 18-May-2010 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Abstract |
| 13 |
======== |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
PyQt4 provides two different (and incompatible) APIs. API 1 is the |
| 16 |
original API and the one supported by PySide. API 2 is a new Python |
| 17 |
3-specific API that is much more Pythonic. This PSEP proposes that |
| 18 |
PySide adopt PyQt4's API 2 for PySide. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rationale |
| 22 |
========= |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
PyQt4 provides two different (and incompatbile) APIs [#PyQt-APIs]_. API |
| 25 |
1 is useful for those using PyQt4 to prototype C++/Qt programs since |
| 26 |
it is very close to the C++/Qt API. However, for those who want to create |
| 27 |
Python Qt programs in their own right, and especially for existing Python |
| 28 |
programmers, API 1 is cumbersome and un-Pythonic when it comes to handling |
| 29 |
QStrings and QVariants, both of which are used a lot. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
If PySide were to support API 2, it will make PySide much more attractive |
| 32 |
to Python 3 programmers. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Also, supporting API 2 will mean that existing Python 3/PyQt4 programs that |
| 35 |
use API 2 by default will be able to switch to PySide. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
One key purpose of API 2 is to avoid the need for Python programmers to |
| 38 |
have to worry or even know about QString or QVariant. For Python |
| 39 |
programmers str is the string they are used to so translation to/from |
| 40 |
QString should be transparent and automatic. Similarly, why should |
| 41 |
Python programmers have to know about QVariant when that is a C++ |
| 42 |
workaround for C++'s lack of support for duck typing etc.? Again, |
| 43 |
translation to/from QVariant should be transparent and automatic. API 2 |
| 44 |
achieves this and eliminates QString and (to some extent) QVariant. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
API 1 vs. API 2 |
| 48 |
=============== |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
No QString and almost no QVariant |
| 52 |
--------------------------------- |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
The key difference between the APIs is that API 2 does not make QString |
| 55 |
or (to some extent) QVariant available to programmers. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
This means using Python's native string types for strings (e.g., unicode |
| 58 |
for Python 2 and str for Python 3). |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
PyQt's approach to dealing with QVariants will be mimicked: Python |
| 61 |
objects are automatically converted to and from QVariants wherever |
| 62 |
QVariants must be passed as arguments and when QVariants are returned. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
By supporting automatic conversion to and from QVariants, any Python |
| 65 |
object (including dicts, lists, and tuples) can be used wherever a |
| 66 |
QVariant is expected, so most programmers most of the time won't have to |
| 67 |
know or care about QVariant at all. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
For QString, API 2 goes beyond simply replacing QString with str (or |
| 70 |
unicode on Python 2). In particular, API 2 also automatically converts |
| 71 |
QChar and QStringRef to and from strs (or unicodes on Python 2). It also |
| 72 |
converts QStringList to and from a Python list of strs (list of unicodes |
| 73 |
on Python 2). (PyQt4's API 2 does not implement QLatin1Char, |
| 74 |
QLatin1String, or QStringMatcher.) |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
Native C++/Qt QStrings are mutable, so PyQt4's API 2 has changed the |
| 77 |
signatures of some of the affected functions to return a str (or a tuple |
| 78 |
including a str) when in the C++/Qt API a QString parameter would have been |
| 79 |
modified. |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
In addition, API 2 has added two methods to QFontMetrics and QFontMetricsF, |
| 82 |
widthChar() and boundingRectChar(), which take a str of length one and call |
| 83 |
QFontMetrics::width() and QFontMetrics::boundingRect() with a QChar |
| 84 |
argument. These were added because the width of a single character may be |
| 85 |
different from that of a string that contains a single character, even if |
| 86 |
the characters are the same. |
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
If the need arises during the implementation phase, the QVariant class |
| 89 |
may be added to the API so that programmers can pass a QVariant |
| 90 |
explicitly if they need to. If this is done, to support the creation of |
| 91 |
QVariants, a set of static functions named after the types in |
| 92 |
QVariant.Type will need to be implemented, e.g.:: |
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
QVariant.fromUInt(pythonObject) -> QVariant |
| 95 |
QVariant.fromInt(pythonObject) -> QVariant |
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
The benefit of API 2 in this regard is that programmers never have to |
| 98 |
explicitly convert between QString and str, so programmers never get |
| 99 |
caught out accidentally trying to use a QString method on a str or vice |
| 100 |
versa. For the Qt APIs that accept or return QVariants, API 2 allows |
| 101 |
programmers to pass any Python object and when a QVariant is returned |
| 102 |
from Qt it is automatically converted to its original Python type (with |
| 103 |
an invalid QVariant mapped to None). |
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
Changes to Other Types |
| 107 |
---------------------- |
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
API 2 also affects some other types, as follows. |
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
Where QByteArrays are expected, bytes objects can be used, but unlike |
| 112 |
QString, QByteArray has been retained to ease porting from API 1, so in |
| 113 |
API 2 byte sequences can be represented by QByteArray, bytes, and |
| 114 |
bytearray objects. |
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
QDate, QDateTime, QTime, and QUrl's __hash__() methods return a string |
| 117 |
representation so that identical dates (and identical date/times or times |
| 118 |
or URLs) will have identical hash values. |
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
QTextStream's bin(), hex(), and oct() functions have been renamed bin_(), |
| 121 |
hex_(), and oct_(), to avoid conflicting with Python's built-ins of the |
| 122 |
same names. |
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
Support for Keyword Arguments |
| 126 |
============================= |
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
PyQt 4.7 adds support for keyword arguments which is very convenient and |
| 129 |
much more Pythonic. |
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
This change represents an extension to the PyQt APIs that a compatible |
| 132 |
PySide ought to implement. |
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
One problem with this is that while changes to argument names don't affect |
| 135 |
C++/Qt, they would break the Python API. Furthermore, since changing |
| 136 |
argument names is harmless in C++/Qt, such changes do take place between Qt |
| 137 |
versions. This means that for PySide, sensible names must be used in the |
| 138 |
first place---and stuck to. Naturally, for PyQt compatibility, PySide ought |
| 139 |
to use the same names as PyQt. |
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
PyQt does not integrate Python and Qt's property systems, but it does allow |
| 142 |
Qt properties to be set when an object is constructed using keyword |
| 143 |
arguments (i.e., where the keyword is the name of a Qt property). The |
| 144 |
same functionality will be implemented in PySide. Also, |
| 145 |
PyQt provides the pyqtConfigure() method for all objects that have |
| 146 |
Qt properties: this method can be called at any time and the object's Qt |
| 147 |
properties set by passing it keyword arguments. However, since |
| 148 |
essentially the same functionality is already provided by |
| 149 |
QObject.setProperty() and .property() methods, pyqtConfigure() will not be |
| 150 |
implemented as part of this PSEP. |
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
Compatibility |
| 153 |
============= |
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
The proposed API 2 is incompatible with API 1, but since PySide is not |
| 156 |
yet widely used and hasn't reached version 1.0.0, it seems reasonable to |
| 157 |
break compatibility for the sake of getting PySide "right". Furthermore, |
| 158 |
if API 2 is adopted it means that PySide programs will have the same API |
| 159 |
whether Python 2 or Python 3 is used which will make it much easier for |
| 160 |
those who start out with PySide and Python 2 and later on port to Python |
| 161 |
3---something that isn't so easy with PyQt. |
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
References |
| 165 |
========== |
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
.. [#PyQt-APIs] PyQt v4 Reference Manual: Potential Incompatibilities |
| 168 |
section, Selecting Incompatible APIs section, Support for Keyword |
| 169 |
Arguments section, and Support for Qt Properties section |
| 170 |
(http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/static/Docs/PyQt4/pyqt4ref.html) |
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
Contributors |
| 174 |
============ |
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
Richard Dale and Detlev Offenbach pointed out that QByteArray had been |
| 177 |
retained in API 2. |
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
Richard Dale and Lauro Moura gave suggestions regarding QVariant. |
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
Hugo Lima proposed choosing one of PyQt's alternative APIs and implementing |
| 182 |
only that for both Python 2 and Python 3 PySide versions. |
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
The section of Exceptions was dropped as a result of feedback from Matti |
| 185 |
Airas; Matti also added to the discussion in numerous ways. |
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
Detlev Offenbach also contributed to the discussion on Compatibility. |
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
Copyright |
| 191 |
========= |
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
This document has been placed in the public domain. |